Subscribe to
Fully Vetted
Dr. Coates is a veterinarian based in the other “Sunshine State” – that's Colorado to the rest of you – where she lives and plays with a varied range of animals. She shares her professional and personal experiences, Monday through Friday, here on petMD's blog, the Fully Vetted. Log in for your daily dose of her insight and wisdom.

 

'Poisonous People Food' '¦Seriously? (and other modern pet food musings)

August 31, 2008 / (14) comments


The problem with this Good Morning America segment on the ABCNews website is all in the title: “Poisonous People Food.”

Beyond the scary headline, everything contained therein is pretty responsible, just like everything else Dr. Marty Becker works on. My criticism is confined to the acknowledgment that whenever “people foods” get singled out for their evils (even in this case, where toxic foods are deservedly maligned), a significant percentage of pet owners will invariably assume that all “people food” is potentially poisonous.

After all, most of you know that we humans can be pretty limited in our thinking when it comes to feeding our pets.

Case in point: Every day I still get clients who proudly proclaim that their pets get “no people food.” “Nothing but the best,” they say, while stuffing too-fat Fido with Pup-Peronis hand over fist.

Like so many pet owners, they’re still stuck in the mindset that all “human food” is somehow “bad” for pets and that the animal equivalent of a Milky Way bar is somehow preferable because it’s made with pets in mind.

Never mind that sometimes food made with pets in mind does get extra-special treatment…in lax Federal oversight when it comes to safety.

But that’s another topic…

Call me a conspiracy theorist, but it’s my view that “human food” as no-no is a lie initiated by Madison Avenue at the inception of the pet food industry’s call to standardize the feeding of pets back in the 1950’s and 60’s.

Before then, Americans had always fed pets their leftovers and/or selected cheap cuts of meat. As a result, pets often suffered nutritional diseases at rates arguably proportional to the lack of prevailing knowledge on canine and feline nutrition.

The standardization, commercialization and marketing of pet diets changed the dynamics of daily feedings forever, giving humans the convenience they needed to keep pets in their homes and strongly suggesting that pets belonged “in the family.” So too did it provide more balanced diets for pets, much-needed research into nutrition and eliminated the vast majority of nutritional diseases that previously afflicted pets.

Some of us may decry the mass marketing of pet foods today (and for good reason), but back then commercial pet food made pet keeping possible, saved lives and stimulated the US’s drive to become a powerhouse pet culture.

But things are different now—at least for those of us who want better for our pets and demand more from pet food manufacturers. We’ve come full circle. Pet foods extruded from machines in staggering volumes no longer astound and amaze—they disgust and incite suspicion, instead.

How can you expect me to feed her THAT, every day of her life, forever and ever AMEN until the day of her death?

Still, that’s not the way most human feeders of pets see it. And I can’t completely blame them. As in this ABCNews piece, they’re warned that people foods hold potentially frightening compounds you may not know are harming your pet. You’re urged to stick with commercially prepared products for pets if you’re not 100% sure that what your feeding will not bring on your pet’s death.

Vets have a big hand in propagating this belief. Mostly, that’s because we want your pets to be safe. We don’t want to see you use your own [presumably limited] judgment in writing your own pet food recipes because we fear that our tacit endorsement of your doing so makes us complicit in the illnesses your pets may consequently suffer. Same, too, for raw food feeding, etc.

Yeah, Dr. Becker in this segment toes that veterinary party line, too. And I can’t blame him. He’s got five minutes to explain the basics. He doesn’t have the luxury of explaining that well-educated pet owners can feed raw if they’re careful in x, y and z ways or that feeding “people food” as a supplement (or even as an entire diet, if undertaken knowledgeably) isn’t actually preferable to a single commercially prepared diet day in, day out.

Problem is, the implication is still there: Stick to your machine-made, mass-produced pet foods. “People foods” are worth fearing.

What I wouldn’t give to know that carrots and apple slices had finally supplanted Fido’s Pup-Peronis (for good) and that a healthy diet with the variety nature intended could be had for all pets…without all that hand-wringing over “spoiling” Fluffy’s diet with that evil “human food.”

Subscribe to Fully Vetted
COMMENTS (14)
1
by on 09/05/2008 09:41am

Magan: Yep. I always forget that people eat s--- at home. Home cooking for me is a sacred duty and *what* I eat gets an incredible amount of daily attention. Perhaps that's why I have less tolerance for these segments than others do. It just seems so obvious that fresh ingredients prepared simply are healthier and often far less expensive than the alternative "fast foods."

2
by on 09/05/2008 01:32am

My issue with feeding "people food" is that IME a lot of PEOPLE eat really crappy FOOD. So there are a lot of people supplementing Fido's kibble (usually grocery store) with cheeseburgers, bacon grease and leftover mashed potatoes and gravy. I think this GMA segment was probably aimed at those people.

The people that are more educated about diet, take time to prepare well balanced meals for themselves, and already feed their pets a good quality diet (commercially prepped or not) are obviously perfectly capable of supplementing with fresh food and most probably do.

3
by on 09/02/2008 07:46pm

It's funny how people food is supposedly so bad yet the people food companies are jumping on the bandwagon to make pet food identical to people food (confused yet? hehe) - case in point pet yogurt , rachel rae dogfood (see my posts)

Although Im no veterarinarian I think its ok to give your pet a bit of good quality people food as long as its in moderation to their usual pet food.

Excellent post!

4
by on 09/02/2008 12:36pm

I was recently given a pack of treats that are "only available from vets so you know it's good" -- yes its the thought that counts -- but the third or fourth ingredient was high fructose corn syrup. Oh well...Apparently all critical thinking is supposed to be abandoned when considering pet food.

Then again, I do have to say that growing up we had a golden retriever who lived a long (16 years) and healthy life eating the cheapest food from the grocery store. Not that I would feed that to my dog nor would my mom do that again, but if the dog could live on that, our present friends will be fine eating a well-balanced home cooked diet.

5
by on 09/02/2008 10:47am

Jennifer: On the pet food looking good enough to eat thing: I know a couple in New York City who buys super-premium raw food for their dogs. They're such busy people (working in their home office) they've confessed to me that sometimes they'll skip ordering out and simply cook the dog food.

"Honey, think we should have dog food tonight?"

6
by on 09/02/2008 10:16am

Given that my dog gets a base food of kibble and we are both mammals I have no probkem at all giving him modest amounts of any normal food I eat (meat, vegetables, bread). It seems simple to me, just stay away from weird foods like candies, booze and stuff with mondo artifical ingredients like sweetners.

7
by on 09/01/2008 01:01pm

I guess most people just don't want to do the research you need to do if you want to decide what human food you can give to your dog/cat/rat/crab/whatever. And of course they belive pet shops ect. who tell them to buy only the commercial food (and toys ect.). And most vets will telll owners that people food is a bad idea because they probably meet a lot more people who just stuff their dog with anything the dog will eat than people who have done research and feed only suitable human food.

What I think is weird is that so many pet foods look like their are fit for human consumption. For me, that is most obvious in rodent treats: sugar, honey, colourful popped rice and a lot more potentially unhealthy stuff. The goal is clearly to make people think: "hmm, that looks delicious, I could eat that, so it can't be bad for my hamster."

8
by on 08/31/2008 11:46pm

My experience has been that most vets make you feel guilty over "people food", thinking that is the root cause of obesity in pets. I wish more would state what quality foods and treats are best for pets in lieu of pup-aronis.

My neighbor had two very *long-lived* Scotties, both exceeding 14 yrs. of age. She fed good quality kibble mixed with lots of people veggies & lean meat scraps. Couldn't argue that she was doing something wrong, that's for sure.

9
by on 08/31/2008 09:18pm

I was going to comment about the b-naturals newsletter site and am pleased as punch that Shannon beat me to it. I have been researching dog feeding for 10+ years and do rescue. I have 11 dogs at the moment. The b-naturals newsletters, most written by Lew Olson, are responsible and documented information. I depend on the information and citations I find there.

10
by on 08/31/2008 08:58pm

Before I got my dog, I read up on dog food. I ended up feeding kibble with human food added. I used reference books written by Wendy Volhard to choose the supplements. Plain yogurt, brown rice, and low fat cottage cheese, for instance. I also feed raw meat from a local farmer once or twice a week, and raw bones a couple times a month. It is a mix of convenience and simplicity. Wendy Volhard has a web site, which used to list suggested human food supplements, but I don't think that chart is online any longer. My library carried the books. I also read Whole Dog Journal. It is great there are so many high quality "human quality" pet foods. It can get confusing.

11
by on 08/31/2008 02:35pm

Thank you for writing this. It's always been my opinion (before and after my vet assistant course) that not all "people food" is dangerous. Yet people (and some vets) still condemn me for supplementing my pets commercial diet with meat, veggies and rice. My grandmother has never fed kibble ever, but supplements the scraps, liver stew - with no onions or garlic -- and veggies with cheap canned food. I've never seen such healthy long lived dogs.

I know vets have the best intention in mind when they suggest kibble/wet food and only that but I only wish more would take time to help educate the public that a little variety within reason is never a bad thing.

12
by on 08/31/2008 02:07pm

Are there any good references out there that discuss suitable "people food" supplements to our pets' diets? Do you recommend any websites or books on this topic?
Thanks!

13
by on 08/31/2008 02:01pm

In other words, life is too short to be dogmatic!

14
by on 08/31/2008 02:00pm

It's not a conspiracy theory if it's true. Most of what we think we "know" about how to feed pets is a result of pet-food advertising. I bet that's true of a lot of what we think we "know" about everything!

As for Dr. Becker's piece ... yeah, it's hard to fit everything into a couple of minutes. But I think if you listen again he also makes a point that there's nothing wrong with a home-prepared diet. I would bet that a lot of veterinarians are feeling this way now, in the wake of the pet-food recall.

As we've noted before, we're all over the board at PetConnection.com, and no nutritional "litmus test" is required of our bloggers. We have people who feed commercial, people who feed raw and people who feed a mix of commercial with either canned met or raw. Funny enough, I encompass them all: Most of what my pets and I eat is home-prepared from local, organic sources, but I also eat pizza and they eat commercial dehydrated. :)

LEAVE COMMENTS

Connect with Facebook or login to leave comments.


About fully vetted

Patty Khuly, VMD, MBA

Photo of Dr Khuly

Dr. Khuly is a former petMD blogger and small animal veterinarian in Miami, Florida, where she practices medicine at Sunset Animal Clinic and serves on the board of the South Florida Veterinary Medical Association. She is a graduate of Wellesley College, the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, and The Wharton School of Business.

As a significant sideline, she writes...a lot. She authors pet health columns for USA Today, The Miami Herald and Vetstreet. She also writes a popular monthly column for Veterinary Practice News and serves as regular contributor to Veterinary Economics, The Bark, and the Veterinary News Network.

Dr. Khuly lives in South Miami with her brood of hens, goats, dogs, cats...and humans.

Subscribe to Fully Vetted

Most Read Fully Vetted Articles

Check Your Pet Food Bags!
The recall of pet foods manufactured at a Diamond Pet Food plant in Gaston, S.C....
READ MORE
No Excuse for Skipping Rabies Vaccination
The Carlsbad, New Mexico area just suffered through one of the worst rabies outbreaks...
READ MORE
Any Dog Can Bite
May 20-26 is National Dog Bite Prevention Week. Being bitten is just one of the...
READ MORE
A New Link Between Pet and Human Health
A study appearing in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases points to a new link...
READ MORE

Most Commented Articles

No Excuse for Skipping Rabies Vaccination
The Carlsbad, New Mexico area just suffered through one of the worst rabies outbreaks...
READ MORE
Does Horse Racing Deserve Your Support?
I breathed a big sigh of relief on the evening of Saturday, May 5. The 138th running...
READ MORE
Maggots: Thumbs Up or Down?
The weather is starting to heat up here in Colorado, which means that any day...
READ MORE
Palliative Care ≠ Murder
I talked yesterday about compassion fatigue, which often develops when caregivers...
READ MORE
 
MORE FROM PETMD.COM
©1999-2012 petMD, LLC. All Rights Reserved
x
Stay informed about your pet's health...and more!