Subscribe to
Fully Vetted
Dr. Coates is a veterinarian based in the other “Sunshine State” – that's Colorado to the rest of you – where she lives and plays with a varied range of animals. She shares her professional and personal experiences, Monday through Friday, here on petMD's blog, the Fully Vetted. Log in for your daily dose of her insight and wisdom.

 

Pet healthcare dreams and HMO nightmares

February 07, 2007 / (8) comments


OK so my healthcare is in the hands of an HMO. All of us at my hospital (save the two owners) are offered this dubious benefit. Actually, I’m thankful; I might not have found affordable insurance for myself otherwise. But this healthcare plan truly adds stress to my life. Furthermore, it gives rise to murderous dreams involving [very stupid] claimspeople sitting in Aetna-blue damasked cubicles with telephone headsets indelibly attached to their skulls. If that’s not a nightmare I challenge you to come up with a better example.

I’m sure some of you have had similar feelings (excepting the vivid dream, perhaps). If not, I’m told by wise veterans of the healthcare system that all you need in order to acquire a solid understanding of the healthcare crisis is a nice scary case of breast cancer or a raging meningitis. Extreme illness as a surefire path to enlightenment…hmmm…joining a monastery seems so much simpler.

Recently I’ve had cause to reexamine my reliance on an HMO. It’s also made way for musings on the co-existing efficiencies and deficiencies of the current veterinary system of healthcare. Here’s my tale of woe and its subsequent analysis:

Even the simple health issues someone my age has to deal with are made hugely complex with the insertion of the three-letter acronym, HMO, on the almighty piece of plastic that determines whether you will receive care that day or not.

Over the past three weeks I’ve been to five doctors, two labs and two specialty service technicians. All this…and I’m a fundamentally healthy person!

This workup is considered fairly routine for a woman making her foray into the nearer shores of middle age. And to have it done right requires my insurance company to individually approve each part of the process…which means each individual healthcare provider has to fret over the minutiae of the referral process.

Instead of having one or two doctors take care of everything I’ve had to see five to comply with HMO referral policies. I’ve had to wait on hold for at least twenty minutes at a time each time I’m forced to call my insurance company for approvals. I’ve also had to stress about finding in-network labs and facilities, driving much further if I want the higher-quality versions of basic diagnostics (bloodwork, cytopathology, imaging, etc.). And, again, it can’t all be done under one or two roofs—it has to get spread out…to minimize efficiency, of course.

And the quality of service? The medicine gets a very good to excellent rating (only because I worked the system hard to access it). But the customer service? Decent to downright poor.

These front-desk people apparently have no notion of being in a service industry. I was even turned away once—rudely—due to a “schedule misunderstanding.” (I’d like to see that happen at a vet hospital—it’s never happened at mine.) Another time I was badgered (nastily) for my referral paperwork (by an office manager) and told the doctor could not see me without it—all because the receptionist had left it in the copier. No apologies.

Veterinary care might have far to go in providing the high level of human healthcare many of us can afford only through our current system. But the inefficiencies inherent in this system’s construction makes me wonder if building a vet version will prove any better. The layers of human lassitude that overlie the layers of bureaucratic, money-milking middlemen are enough to render the best of care unforgivingly stressful.

The cynic in me says the HMOs design their inefficiencies to weed out those unwilling to work hard to get care. It’s OK if they lose money paying out fees to all my superfluous doctors; the more plentiful, less avid seekers of healthcare will make up the difference in spades…by not getting any.

One of these days, I predict that my own industry will start to show its bureaucratic tendencies through more intrusive pet health insurance programs. If it helps a greater number of pets get better healthcare, who am I to stand in the way?

Somewhere between the evils of 100% managed care and straight fee-for-service lies a happy medium that works for us all. Maybe pet medicine will be the first in healthcare to finally build a system worth keeping. Or maybe not… What makes us think we can achieve the delicate balance that’s evaded human medicine for decades?

Maybe if we take out the big money and the politics behind the system, it can actually achieve some semblance of functionality. And guess what? That’s vet medicine for you: no big bucks and precious little politicking. Come to think of it, we might actually have a shot at success.

Regardless of what the future brings, my recent experiences managing the treacherous HMO waters have taught me [at least] one thing: I hope I never live to see the day when I’ll refuse care for a pet who walks in the door without a proper referral.

Subscribe to Fully Vetted
COMMENTS (8)
1
by Dr. Patty Khuly on 02/11/2007 12:05pm

Stacy: Are the greyhound rescuers actually supportive of the tracks? As fabulous as the breed may be I have to wonder at the rationality of supporting a sport rife with canine injustices to maintain a breeding line of [admittedly] beautiful beasts. It's great that they do their best to keep the tracks in line but from what I've seen in my area there's a world of change still needed in those kennels.

The last adoptee I saw (last week) had painfully worn and fractured teeth, a bulgingly ripped hamstring and was severely scarred all over (especially over her jugular) after another dog attacked her. Her condition is pretty exemplary in my experience.

These dogs do not live comfortable lives and it makes me sad to hear that some of those who rescue them seek not to eradicate the problem but to propagate it--for the sake of something so trite and human as the concept of a breed...?

2
by Stacy on 02/09/2007 02:48am

zanperl- Most bird owners, or should I say bird owners that have pet birds that have long life spans usually have their pets written into their wills.

One of my blue fronts came from my former boss who is vet. We agreed when I adopted him that if I couldn't keep him for any reason, that I would return him back to him. I didn't pay any money for this bird, instead I had to agree to have blood tests done on my other blue front as a way to protect his bird from becoming ill. The lab work came to like $100.00 or something like that and Oscar came up clear of any diseases that he was looking for, so I got Pepper.

The other reason Pepper was given to me was because he knows that I am a responsible owner and that he does get a yearly physical, ect. He knew I am because I worked by his side every day for 5 years, even on the days when I would have preferred to walk away from that place and never return.

Alot of places that do rescue now have a clause that states that the animal needs to be returned to the place where it was adopted from should the owner no longer be able to be kept regardless of species. I've never worked for a shelter or rescue league, but I'm assuming they do this so they can go through the screening process to place the animal in another responsible, loving home.

Since most of these "policies" are written without a death clause of the adopted owner, the best thing to do is to discuss such issues with the shelter or rescue league that you choose to adopt from. Depending in the rescue league may get you a different answer as they are not all the same. Some places ( where I live anyway) profile people in terms of age. If they feel that somebody is too old to adopt a pet, they simply decline the application without ever giving the potential new owner a reason. This of course can open a whole other can of worms as some could say that is age discrimination, but I won't get into that.

If you find that the answers you are given to such questions are not acceptable, find another rescue league that will work with you. If a place is rude to you for such questions, don't adopt from them. I don't see any reason for any place to do that, but there are shelter owners around that feel threatened when a possible new owner starts questioning things beyond what is posted on their website or adoption application. I don't know why that is, it just is. One would think asking questions beyond what is in front of a person would be a good thing, but some take it as new owners are trying to challenge them for whatever reason.

Then again, I'm not of fan of thinking "within the box" so odds are the next time I decide to adopt a animal at some point, I'm going to be declined alot before I find a place that will accept me regardless of my list of references and a home check. The same can be said for places I'll refuse to adopt from as well as places that cannot answer my "off the top of my head" questions that are valid, I don't want to be bothered with them. I mention the word valid as sometimes I'm known to ask things that don't pertain the the animal itself. For example, my recent visit to a local Greyhound rescue lead to questions about how the rescue center felt about our dog tracks.

The answer I got surprised me. Instead of being mad about dog racing, they are actually working hard with breeders, dog owners and the tracks to ensure that all Greyhounds are taken care of properly and have a better life before they retire than they have in years past. Their reason for that is because if all dog tracks were shut down, there wouldn't be anymore racing versions of the rracing Greyhound as most people are not willing to spend $3,000-5,000 for a puppy or dog. The AKC version of the Greyhound doesn't have the muscle mass or "heart" of the racing version. Their body build is more like a Whippet and their personalities are much different. These are not necessarily bad things, but it seems as though people that are into the racing version of Greyhounds definately have an attachment to the breed and are willing to do anything within their means to keep the breed around for many dog owning generations to come.

I think alot of places could take a few pages out of this rescue leagues book. Not only because they impressed me, but because they are not looking for status or some big claim to fame for what they do. They simply love the breed and get their hackles up or feel threatened because a question is asked beyond the "adoption" process. If anything, they encourage off the wall questions as to them it shows that a possible new owner has a true interest in the animal they are considering adopting.

Good luck in quest in finding a conure.

3
by zandperl on 02/08/2007 10:17pm

On the one hand, I believe that responsible pet owners should set aside a chunk of money on the day they take their pet home to pay for emergencies for their pet, and anything else is irresponsible of the owner. On the other hand, I don't think that pets are a privledge for the rich, and I feel that a loving home is more important than a rich one.

I've heard that pet insurance isn't worth the cost currently, due to things like what's not covered, deductables, and yearly caps.

I like how bird rescues are always willing to take back the bird for the rest of its life - I'm hoping to get a conure within a year, and I've been looking at a couple rescues. I don't like how some say that you *have* to return it rather than giving it to another responsible owner. I wonder what they say about the event of the *owner's* death.

4
by Diane on 02/07/2007 10:20pm

I was a claims examiner for a health insurance company for four years. I could tell you some stories that would really give you nightmares.

After the experiences I've had with an HMO (I was hospitalized a couple of years ago, and the stress from dealing with mishandled claims almost put me back in), I hope to God I never have to sign up for another one.

5
by Gina on 02/07/2007 09:34pm

Georg ... I'm laughing! It was prescribed that way, you say!

I have long advocated something that isn't currently available: High-deductible pet-care insurance. I can budget for and afford top-flight preventive care. I can budget for and afford a lot of the routine things, the fairly regularl ear infection, laceration, etc. Yes, I can afford and budget for end of life care, pain control meds and euthanasia.

What I can't afford and couldn't begin to budget for is cancer treatment, complicated orthopedic surgery, etc. I would happilly pay $300 a year or whatever for a plan with a deductible of $1,000, $2,000 or more, to have it available to pay for care that truly can go into the second mortgage stage otherwise. Because in an emergency I can always come up with a grand or two, but beyond that ... kinda kiffy sometimes.

6
by Georg on 02/07/2007 08:19pm

For pet insurance, I want disaster insurance. Say suddenly my dog is hit by a car. How can I afford his surgery to repair him? At the moment, I can't. But if I had an insurance to cover that sort of thing, that would be lovely. I can handle the regular shots and yearly visits. If I couldn't, I should not take the pet home. These costs must be factored in just like the cost of food into regular care of your pet.

As for my own insurance, it's hard to be happy about insurance when you can't afford the co-pay. I was given a medication today that I have to take as a suppository. It's $80 *after* insurance. The company doesn't even have to tell me to bend over, because it's prescribed that way. I sincerely hope it helps the issue, because I'll be really angry if I have an allergic reaction to it or it doesn't help at all.

7
by Stacy on 02/07/2007 07:34pm

Hmmm...

We live with a different kind of monster in terms of health insurance, it's called a PPO. It works simliar to a HMO only we don't need a referal just to think about going to a doctor. We can come and go as we wish, however, there are hefty bills to pay if we don't go to a preferred provider, lab, ect. So far all the doctors and labs that we use are on the insurance companies preferred list, so I don't complain too much.

What has recently gotten my knickers in a twist is what changes were made to our plan this year.

We used to get a good deal on eye exams, glasses and contacts. Eye exams were $120.00 and glasses were anywhere from 30-50% off. That discount also included the lenses. That all changed this year. Now to get a routine, yearly eye exam we have to pay and extra $28.00 a month, unless the eye exam happens because of an injury, then it will be covered under our regular plan.

In place of the deals that were to be had for routine eye exams, they are now doing gastric bypass surgery on anybody over 18. Back the truck up!!! I cannot get a routine eye exam without paying extra, but they are willing to do $25,000 surgery on a person that claims they have no control over what they put in their mouths?

To make matters worse, they are not requiring that the people that are having the surgery to take classes on healthy eating or any kind of nurtitional support. And there is no guarantee that they surgery will work or not cause other health problems later in life. A relative of mine had this surgery done 3 times and she's paying the price with her health as she has more problems now than before the surgery. Most of those problems are orthopedic and her doctors cannot fix it.

I'd like to how the spawns of satan came up with this brilliant plan.

Moving on to pets...

It has been awhile since I've actually taken the time to see what is offered in terms of pet health insurance these days. When it first came out, it stunk! They would not treat animals with pre-existing health problems, they would not cover animals over age 7 regardless of health,blah,blah,blah. What they would cover is puppy shots, a spay or neuter, and injuries as long as the animal was healthy otherwise. If there was any way they could link an injury to a problem that they could consider pre-existing (i.e hip dyplasia) they would only cover part of the cost of the injury and even that depended on who was dealing with the claim the day it was processed.

So has the pet world been poisoned by greed and bureaucratic nonsense? Indeed it has. Can't blame the animals or their owners for that one as anybody that didn't bother to read the fine print of these policies are getting soaked on a monthly basis because they are trying to do the right thing by their pets.

While I cannot say for sure who writes these bogus plans or policies, I'm almost willing to bet it is people in the human insurance industry as they are too much alike for it not to be them.

On a lighter note, my husband has been informed over the past 13 years that if something really bad happens to me, he is to bring me to my vet. I've been with my primary physician since I was 13 and he is a good guy, but should I become a total vegetable or something like it, I want my vet to oversee my care instead. I put all my faith in her to make the right decisions and to treat me with diginity and respect as she won't have our insurance company yapping in her ear about what is "best" for me.

When I was getting those awful allergy shots a couple of years ago she asked me why I continued to get them as all they were doing was making me sick. I told her what my allergist said about it and she laughed then told me that if I wanted to actually live for another year, it would be in my best interest to stop getting them as they were having opposite effect of what was said to be the cure to all my allergy problems.

She was right. Once I got all that junk out of my system, I wasn't visiting the E.R every other week. Also my issues with acid reflux or heartburn went away, I stopped going through the biggest boxes of Kleenex I could find every other day, stopped having "meals" that consisted of 10 different kinds of medications, and I no longer break out in hives from the dogs, cats or my chinchilla. My allergist was pissed as he was no longer seeing the extra $200.00 a week, but oh well. Where he lacked in looking out for my best interest, my vet took up the slack and was frank about it.

I hope that vets never become like the monsters in the human health care field. Not just my vet, but all vets. I've been told that vet medicine is roughly 10 years behind human medicine in terms of treating various conditions. I'm fine with that as long as it means that pets continue to get the best of care that can possibly be offered as once vet medicine goes in the direction of the human field, things are going to get really ugly and I for one just may be forced to keep a petless home if they do. I deal with enough drivel from the human side of health care, my pets are spared that misery and I'd prefer to keep it that way.

8
by Gina on 02/07/2007 03:03pm

I keep telling you, you need to hook up with my PhD economist buddy. There's a great journal article in it for you both.

LEAVE COMMENTS

Please login or sign up to leave comments.


About fully vetted

Patty Khuly, VMD, MBA

Photo of Dr Khuly

Dr. Khuly is a former petMD blogger and small animal veterinarian in Miami, Florida, where she practices medicine at Sunset Animal Clinic and serves on the board of the South Florida Veterinary Medical Association. She is a graduate of Wellesley College, the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, and The Wharton School of Business.

As a significant sideline, she writes...a lot. She authors pet health columns for USA Today, The Miami Herald and Vetstreet. She also writes a popular monthly column for Veterinary Practice News and serves as regular contributor to Veterinary Economics, The Bark, and the Veterinary News Network.

Dr. Khuly lives in South Miami with her brood of hens, goats, dogs, cats...and humans.

Subscribe to Fully Vetted

Most Read Fully Vetted Articles

Dangers Associated with Novel Ingredient ...
Have you noticed the recent proliferation of over-the-counter pet foods that contain...
READ MORE
The Cost of Care
My daughter recently had her five year old checkup and it was a doozy –...
READ MORE
Horse Slaughter – Coming Back to a Town ...
In 2007, the last plant that slaughtered horses for human consumption within the...
READ MORE
When Puppy Play Goes Too Far
I took my dog to the dog park a few days ago, where he found a kindred spirit...
READ MORE

Most Commented Articles

Horse Slaughter – Coming Back to a Town ...
In 2007, the last plant that slaughtered horses for human consumption within the...
READ MORE
The Cost of Care
My daughter recently had her five year old checkup and it was a doozy –...
READ MORE
Vet-Speak
I’ve heard that one of the most useful parts of my book,
READ MORE
Bilious Vomiting Syndrome
One of the frustrations associated with being a veterinarian is the all-too-common...
READ MORE

PETMD POLL

What would your pet do if it had opposable thumbs?

 
MORE FROM PETMD.COM
©1999-2012 petMD, LLC. All Rights Reserved
x
Stay informed about your pet's health...and more!